As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was a dogged champion of military intervention. Throughout the campaign Clinton has also consistently been the most hawkish of the leading contenders. As president, Clinton will face few obstacles in her desire to exert decisive leadership on the global stage. In the worst-case scenario, President Clinton, in pursuit of a muscular approach to confronting ISIS, will make three related decisions that doom American foreign policy to another decade of turmoil, casualties, and terrorism.

Read about my nightmares at the National Interest.

author image

About Trevor Thrall

I am a professor at George Mason University and Director of the Biodefense Graduate Program.

You Might Also Like...

The Tug of War on ISIS Inside Trump’s Head
The Looming Battle for Trump’s Foreign Policy
Why More Military Action in Syria Is (Still) a Bad Idea

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: